Quick look at bills of local legislators

Here’s a quick look at a few bills from legislators in Hampton Roads: HB570 related to real estate assessments, HB207 related to rules for lineups and SB185 related to menhaden fishing. More below the fold.

Read More »

Hester for Mayor kickoff Saturday

Quayle votes with Dems against discrimination

The Virginia Senate voted 23-17 to pass Sen. Donald McEachin’s SB66 Monday afternoon. The bill prohibits discrimination in public employment and includes sexual orientation. Senator Fred Quayle of Suffolk broke ranks with his Republican colleagues and joined the Democratic majority to pass this bill.

According to The Virginian-Pilot, Quayle voted yea for a rather simple reason:

I just thought it was the right thing to do

Wow. What a concept! Doing the right thing – instead of playing politics – is exactly why we elect these people.  Kudos to Sen. Quayle for recognizing that and being willing to vote in that manner.

By the way – this isn’t the first time Sen. Quayle has broken ranks with his fellow Republicans. Two years ago, he spoke against a cap on real estate taxes, a pretty brave move when you consider that the cap was being touted by a number of Republicans across the Commonwealth as the answer to rising assessments.

Now – can he go over to the House and have a chat with his colleagues there? It would be nice if they did the right thing and passed this bill.

AP/VP: Oops

The headline is correct... on Twitpic

but oops... there's that pesky score thing. on Twitpic The headline was right, but there was a little problem with the score. Colts 31, Saints 17

I wish!

The story was from the AP so I don’t know whether it was wrong in the story or whether somebody at the Virginian-Pilot messed up. In any case, it’s not Dewey defeats Truman but close ;)

h/t to Saints fan extraordinaire, Blaine Stewart

UPDATE: The Pilot has issued a correction on this.  And you can even download the corrected page ;)

Time for electronic filing of all campaign reports

Virginia’s campaign financing rules are pretty loose – pretty much anyone can donate to whomever they choose without limitation. Disclosure of the contributions and expenditures is supposed to be enough. The problem is the form that the disclosure takes.

The State Board of Elections provides, for free, software that allows candidates to file electronically. Such filing is, according to the site, “mandatory for all statewide candidates and political committees that raise or spend more than $10,000 in a calendar year.” Note that it is not required for General Assembly candidates – although the site says nearly 90% of them chose to do so – nor for candidates for local office.  I think it’s time for electronic filing of all campaign finance reports.

Unlike those of General Assembly candidates, local candidates who file their reports on paper do so to the local office of the registrar. As the result, if you want to see what a candidate has received or paid out, you have to call the office and request a copy – for a fee, of course – and then go pick it up. The reports of the General Assembly candidates are available on the SBE website. (Note that while the site says that the reports of local candidates who file electronically are also available, I can’t figure out how to access them. The drop-down menu for “office” on this page doesn’t even have local offices listed.)

The Virginia Public Access Project takes the SBE data and gives value-added information to it, making it possible to easily review money in and out. In recent years, VPAP has attempted to add in the information from local campaigns – but can only do so if the candidate files electronically. No way does VPAP, a 501(c)(3)  charitable organization, have the resources to get the information from the local registrars’ offices and re-key all the data. So as we here in Norfolk approach an election in May, our access to information on who is giving to whom, and where the money is going, is severely limited.

The simple answer is to make electronic filing mandatory. (Funny – the General Assembly can impose on tax preparers an electronic filing requirement but hasn’t applied the same standard to themselves.) Put some teeth behind the disclosure idea. Make everyone file electronically. This won’t be an additional burden or an additional cost to the campaigns – after all, they are filing these reports already. Some are even using the free software from the SBE to prepare them and then submit them locally on paper!

I know it’s too late to get this legislation in place for Norfolk’s May races. But it’s the right thing to do and I hope the General Assembly takes this up at some point in the not-too-distant future.

~

Did I mention that VPAP is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization? :) The service that they provide are invaluable to anyone who follows the money in Virginia politics. But they can’t do it without our help. Every time you access the site, think about giving a few bucks to them.  No contribution is too large or too small. And to our legislators: I’d like to see every single one of them listed as a sponsor every year. To the bloggers who regularly access the site: I challenge you to join me in contributing at least $50 every year to VPAP. (I made my donation over the weekend.) We uses their services, so they deserve our support.

Super Sunday

The New Orleans Saints and the Indianapolis Colts face off today in Super Bowl XLIV. It’s been two weeks since the teams won their respective conferences and I have to say, the least hyped Super Bowl I can remember. Or maybe it’s because my attention has been focused elsewhere.

In any event, I’m looking forward to a real football game today. (Last week’s Pro Bowl wasn’t even worth watching. Whoever it was that came up with the brilliant idea to put the Pro Bowl in between the conference championships and the Super Bowl needs to be fired. The Pro Bowl is supposed to show the best of the best, not the best of the rest.)  The oddsmakers have the Colts as a 5-6 point favorite in the game, a result I’ll certainly take ;) If you haven’t done so, vote your pick below.

As always, the poll will close before the 6:25pm scheduled kickoff.

UPDATE: Congratulations to the New Orleans Saints for winning their first ever Super Bowl. They were the better team tonight and earned the win.

Opinion, please: radar detector ban

Virginia is alone is banning radar detectors in vehicles. House Bill 674 would change that. The bill reported out of committee Friday morning, by an 11-10 vote, and now heads to the House floor.

Simple question: do you support this bill? Vote in the poll and leave your comments below.

Another who supports DADT repeal

It is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do. – Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen

I had the opportunity Wednesday to spend some time with a retired military officer, one whose background and experience I consider unique to the question of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” RADM Tom Ward spent more than 30 years in the Navy, having graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1951.

Recall, if you will, that President Harry Truman, via executive order, integrated the military on July 26, 1948. It did not, however, happen overnight. According to the Truman Library, the Air Force was the first of the armed services to have its integration plan approved – in May 1949 – with the Navy right on its heels the following month. The Army was the most difficult of the services: integration of its troops took approximately five years.

Recall also the role of women in the military. According to this article, women didn’t gain “professional military status” until 1948, when Truman signed the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act. That legislation limited the number of women serving to 2% of the total, the result being that women comprised only 1.4% of the total military in 1970.  Today women account for approximately 20 percent.

Ward was a witness to history, his career having spanned both of these major changes. I was eager to hear his take on Mullen’s remarks, although I have to admit that I was prepared for him to give me an answer defending it. I was pleasantly surprised when he told me he agreed with Mullen.

In our discussion, Ward articulated the similarities between the integration of blacks and women in the military and those of gays. Doing so, he said, wasn’t easy, and he pointed out that problems with women in the military remain today. Like nearly everyone I’ve spoken with on the subject, he acknowledged that gays have always served. He told me a story about a gay group on one of the ships he served on.

Ward honed in on the issue of integrity, part of the Mullen’s remarks, which Mullen reiterated in a tweet after the hearings were over. That is exactly what it is, he told me.

If Ward, who lived through – and participated in – these major changes to the military supports the repeal of DADT, it seems to me that the military should be listening to the likes of him instead of those who only speculate the effects of allowing gays to serve openly.

~

In case you weren’t aware, Virginia Senator Jim Webb, a member of the Armed Services Committee who held those hearings on Tuesday, graduated in the same class as Adm. Mullen – 1968. Webb’s questions/comments at that hearing can be seen here, beginning at about the 3:23 mark and are, in my opinion, disappointing. He basically reiterated his statements in a press release Tuesday afternoon. I happen to know another member of that same class, who told me that he supports the repeal. I’d love to hear from other members of that class and their take on the situation. Right now, it’s 2:1 in favor of repeal.

Oh yeah – and even the architect of DADT appears to support its repeal.

WordPress.com Political Blogger Alliance