Comments on: Note to SurveyUSA: Mark ain’t John Warner http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:19:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: BJ in VA http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3510 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:01:33 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3510 Since RINO John Warner is more concerned with Rights for the Terrorists than keeping Americans alive, what’s the difference? I wouldn’t vote for him for anything either.

]]> By: vjp http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3494 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:13:37 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3494 The A-Team got this one wrong. They must have mis-read what I posted.

]]> By: The A-Team » Oops!!! http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3492 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:11:35 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3492 [...] Vivian J. Paige tell us that the Survey USA poll that showed a higher approval rating in VA for Warner than George Allen mistakenly polled on John Warner, not Mark. [...]

]]> By: Ward Smythe http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3490 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:01:22 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3490 Heh…they didn’t call me.

But I wouldn’t vote for either one of ‘em.

]]> By: Jack http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3473 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:16:16 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3473 I guess that explains some of the Senator’s positions. He’s really a Democrat in disguise!

]]> By: AllenHQ http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3468 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:19:49 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3468 [...] Recent SurveyUSA poll on Warner’s Presidential prospects….was asking about JOHN Warner. [...]

]]> By: vjp http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3463 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:57:15 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3463 I always say that the only poll that matters is the one on Election Day ;)

]]> By: CR UVa http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3462 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:42:47 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3462 Haha, this certainly will not make me any more confident in polling practices. Still, I would think that a decent polling company would be able to avoid such a mistake.

]]> By: Virginia Centrist http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/comment-page-1/#comment-3461 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:34:03 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/note-to-surveyusa-mark-aint-john-warner/#comment-3461 I’ve always said that Warner’s approval ratings are artificially inflated by about 2-3% by people who confuse him for John.

]]>