<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday update (01/21): Redistricting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senators reach bipartisan compromise on redistricting reform &#171; VIVIAN J. PAIGE</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-115284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senators reach bipartisan compromise on redistricting reform &#171; VIVIAN J. PAIGE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/#comment-115284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on redistricting&#160;reform Posted in Local, Politics, Virginia by vjp on January 22nd, 2008   As expected, the Senate Privileges and Elections subcommittee Constitutional Amendments, Reapportionment, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on redistricting&nbsp;reform Posted in Local, Politics, Virginia by vjp on January 22nd, 2008   As expected, the Senate Privileges and Elections subcommittee Constitutional Amendments, Reapportionment, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vjp</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-115280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vjp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/#comment-115280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry - I&#039;m playing catchup. NGC - I think I&#039;ve answered your question a number of times in my writings about redistricting but the short answer is that the GA is elected yet unaccountable, and they have proven that they only thing that matters is protecting themselves. Removing incumbency protection from the redistricting process is a tremendous step towards competition in elections. And that&#039;s good for the electorate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; I&#8217;m playing catchup. NGC &#8211; I think I&#8217;ve answered your question a number of times in my writings about redistricting but the short answer is that the GA is elected yet unaccountable, and they have proven that they only thing that matters is protecting themselves. Removing incumbency protection from the redistricting process is a tremendous step towards competition in elections. And that&#8217;s good for the electorate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-115278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/#comment-115278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um...Glen, how about because once redistricting is over and done with, the &quot;elected and accountable&quot; folks will have decided who they will be elected and accountable to? 

I don&#039;t have the time to go through every single proposal, so you&#039;ll forgive me for trying to cut to the chase and hoping you can answer for me:

Did anyone think to make it like BRAC?  BRAC was (at least in theory) a great method for taking some of the politics out of base closings and putting them back into the hands of people who would consider the needs of a service before the welfare of a single legislative district.

This commission model is not perfect by any stretch--the last base closures and realignments was entirely too-politically convenient in terms of throwing just enough Senators and Members just enough red meat to make sure it passed while concentrating closures in areas represented by legislators not entirely loyal to the administration (and Thelma Drake, but that was mainly her misfortune for representing some of the same people John Warner does).  But at least it&#039;s better than nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;Glen, how about because once redistricting is over and done with, the &#8220;elected and accountable&#8221; folks will have decided who they will be elected and accountable to? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have the time to go through every single proposal, so you&#8217;ll forgive me for trying to cut to the chase and hoping you can answer for me:</p>
<p>Did anyone think to make it like BRAC?  BRAC was (at least in theory) a great method for taking some of the politics out of base closings and putting them back into the hands of people who would consider the needs of a service before the welfare of a single legislative district.</p>
<p>This commission model is not perfect by any stretch&#8211;the last base closures and realignments was entirely too-politically convenient in terms of throwing just enough Senators and Members just enough red meat to make sure it passed while concentrating closures in areas represented by legislators not entirely loyal to the administration (and Thelma Drake, but that was mainly her misfortune for representing some of the same people John Warner does).  But at least it&#8217;s better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not Glen Croshaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-115207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[not Glen Croshaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/#comment-115207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vivian why should we put redistricting in the hands of people who are not elected and accountable to no one?  And if your answer is that in the end the GA gets to decide, then why go through the commission process at all?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivian why should we put redistricting in the hands of people who are not elected and accountable to no one?  And if your answer is that in the end the GA gets to decide, then why go through the commission process at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLK Day Roundup &#171; Crooked Road Commentary</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-115185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MLK Day Roundup &#171; Crooked Road Commentary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/01/21/monday-update-0121-redistricting/#comment-115185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Vivian Paige does a great job looking at the issue of redistricting.        Blogroll [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vivian Paige does a great job looking at the issue of redistricting.        Blogroll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

