<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campaign hurting the party? &#171; VIVIAN J. PAIGE</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-127254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campaign hurting the party? &#171; VIVIAN J. PAIGE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-127254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the campaign is hurting the party while a majority of Clinton supporters (59%) believe it is not. (Biases, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the campaign is hurting the party while a majority of Clinton supporters (59%) believe it is not. (Biases, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wickle</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wickle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick test ... what don&#039;t you like about your favorite candidate.

If you&#039;ve got nothing, then you might not be that honest with yourself or your vote.

If you resort to name-calling or reversing accusations instead of answering challenges, then there&#039;s definitely a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick test &#8230; what don&#8217;t you like about your favorite candidate.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got nothing, then you might not be that honest with yourself or your vote.</p>
<p>If you resort to name-calling or reversing accusations instead of answering challenges, then there&#8217;s definitely a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjohnson68</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjohnson68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[anonymous.... Your quite correct. I did apply my personal philosophy of political rhetoric and perhaps this position does require a reference to some documented foundation. Thanks.

MB.... Spot On.


http://whatilearnedthisweek.wordpress.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anonymous&#8230;. Your quite correct. I did apply my personal philosophy of political rhetoric and perhaps this position does require a reference to some documented foundation. Thanks.</p>
<p>MB&#8230;. Spot On.</p>
<p><a href="http://whatilearnedthisweek.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://whatilearnedthisweek.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you took an observable, quantifiable psychological principle and leveraged your personal philosophy of political rhetoric into it, rjohnson.  Which isn&#039;t to say that you&#039;re necessarily wrong, I just think that anyone could possibly agree that this is the logical consequence of informational biases unless you were to try broadening your point with some foundational writings (Edmund Burke&#039;s Reflections on the Revolution in France would suit your argument well, I think).

I was going to recommend people head over the Waldo Jacquith&#039;s blog and read his blurb on &quot;our morality, shared and unshared.&quot;  I think it provides an interesting starting point for helping us to identify why we adopt the biases we do.

http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2008/04/shared-morality/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you took an observable, quantifiable psychological principle and leveraged your personal philosophy of political rhetoric into it, rjohnson.  Which isn&#8217;t to say that you&#8217;re necessarily wrong, I just think that anyone could possibly agree that this is the logical consequence of informational biases unless you were to try broadening your point with some foundational writings (Edmund Burke&#8217;s Reflections on the Revolution in France would suit your argument well, I think).</p>
<p>I was going to recommend people head over the Waldo Jacquith&#8217;s blog and read his blurb on &#8220;our morality, shared and unshared.&#8221;  I think it provides an interesting starting point for helping us to identify why we adopt the biases we do.</p>
<p><a href="http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2008/04/shared-morality/" rel="nofollow">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2008/04/shared-morality/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
 It’s called intellectual honesty.

And we could use a whole lot more of it.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ding.  One of the things that can really turn me off of someone is realizing that they pick the reasoning to suit the team, and not the team that suits the reasoning.  I understand the usefulness of my-guy-no-matter-what partisans, but I don&#039;t respect them at all.  (And we&#039;re not short of these folks online.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
 It’s called intellectual honesty.</p>
<p>And we could use a whole lot more of it.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ding.  One of the things that can really turn me off of someone is realizing that they pick the reasoning to suit the team, and not the team that suits the reasoning.  I understand the usefulness of my-guy-no-matter-what partisans, but I don&#8217;t respect them at all.  (And we&#8217;re not short of these folks online.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjohnson68</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjohnson68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My apology Dave.... 


Summary... I believe that we&#039;re way too driven by Modern Rhetoric that compels to Pick A Side. Then once there, we gather the information necessary to defend our rushed stance. The masters of Modern Rhetoric seem to ease our pain by offering Opinion-turned-Fact and too many take this information, and false empowerment, and defend the constantly challenged position.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apology Dave&#8230;. </p>
<p>Summary&#8230; I believe that we&#8217;re way too driven by Modern Rhetoric that compels to Pick A Side. Then once there, we gather the information necessary to defend our rushed stance. The masters of Modern Rhetoric seem to ease our pain by offering Opinion-turned-Fact and too many take this information, and false empowerment, and defend the constantly challenged position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Mastio</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Mastio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I read your post and was going to agree with you until I read what RJohnson had to say.

I have now read it three times and I still don&#039;t know what he or she means and I forgot what I was going to say about your post.

I&#039;ll just go back to leveraging longstanding relationships with stuff in order to somethingorother the categorizing and compartmentalizing along one side or the other ... or some junk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I read your post and was going to agree with you until I read what RJohnson had to say.</p>
<p>I have now read it three times and I still don&#8217;t know what he or she means and I forgot what I was going to say about your post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just go back to leveraging longstanding relationships with stuff in order to somethingorother the categorizing and compartmentalizing along one side or the other &#8230; or some junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjohnson68</title>
		<link>http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/04/18/biases/comment-page-1/#comment-126229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjohnson68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3196#comment-126229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vivian,   The study reveals the effects of Modern Rhetoric: The use of language to persuade, drawing conclusions by accepting opinion as fact.

Conservatives have mastered this technique by leveraging a long-standing relationship with religion, repetition, relativism, historical revisionism, and most important Christian Nationalism. As societies are always progressive (not ideologically, but  ever-changing), Conservatives are well positioned to be successful during times of uncertainty and tumult, calling upon peoples to draw closer to yesterday.

Liberals, Democrats or Progressives are unfortunately left to hold the line between today and tomorrow, championing &quot;Change&quot; while respecting &quot;Progress&quot;. 

With this foundation, Americans are challenged to &quot;Take a Position&quot; from those who have little regard for the consideration of all facts, but a sadly profound respect for &quot;Stance&quot;. Conservatives have done well to compel Americans to categorize &amp; compartmentalize our beliefs along one side or the other, ignoring the facts that aren&#039;t consistent with either ideology... i.e. Abortion against Capital Punishment, Capital Punishment against Collateral Damage, etc. So instead considering our positions we accept the notion that Opinion is Fact and that this New Fact justifies our actions..... either way..... quite sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivian,   The study reveals the effects of Modern Rhetoric: The use of language to persuade, drawing conclusions by accepting opinion as fact.</p>
<p>Conservatives have mastered this technique by leveraging a long-standing relationship with religion, repetition, relativism, historical revisionism, and most important Christian Nationalism. As societies are always progressive (not ideologically, but  ever-changing), Conservatives are well positioned to be successful during times of uncertainty and tumult, calling upon peoples to draw closer to yesterday.</p>
<p>Liberals, Democrats or Progressives are unfortunately left to hold the line between today and tomorrow, championing &#8220;Change&#8221; while respecting &#8220;Progress&#8221;. </p>
<p>With this foundation, Americans are challenged to &#8220;Take a Position&#8221; from those who have little regard for the consideration of all facts, but a sadly profound respect for &#8220;Stance&#8221;. Conservatives have done well to compel Americans to categorize &amp; compartmentalize our beliefs along one side or the other, ignoring the facts that aren&#8217;t consistent with either ideology&#8230; i.e. Abortion against Capital Punishment, Capital Punishment against Collateral Damage, etc. So instead considering our positions we accept the notion that Opinion is Fact and that this New Fact justifies our actions&#8230;.. either way&#8230;.. quite sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

