Comments on: Fake NC ballot http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/ Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:25:27 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: TD Nguyen http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-130532 TD Nguyen Thu, 08 May 2008 23:48:19 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-130532 Go Viv! Other examples of his fraud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-H8cYy5yUs http://www.electionjournal.org/?p=247 Go Viv!

Other examples of his fraud:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-H8cYy5yUs

http://www.electionjournal.org/?p=247

]]> By: KCinDC http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-130137 KCinDC Tue, 06 May 2008 02:49:07 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-130137 So what is it that you think is happening? The experienced folks behind this think that they'll be successful in having unsuspecting voters show up and pass these ballots off as real? How would they not notice when the people at the polls give them the real ballots? I'm not quite sure how this is supposed to work if it's a conspiracy to steal the election rather than a stupid mistake. So what is it that you think is happening? The experienced folks behind this think that they’ll be successful in having unsuspecting voters show up and pass these ballots off as real? How would they not notice when the people at the polls give them the real ballots? I’m not quite sure how this is supposed to work if it’s a conspiracy to steal the election rather than a stupid mistake.

]]> By: vjp http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-129635 vjp Sun, 04 May 2008 16:55:43 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-129635 RC - two points. One, I have a significant number of NC readers who may or may not be aware that this flier is <b>not</b> official. That's why I put it up. Two, if you follow the links before jumping to the defense of the PAC, you might learn that the folks thought to be behind this are not new to politics. RC – two points. One, I have a significant number of NC readers who may or may not be aware that this flier is not official. That’s why I put it up. Two, if you follow the links before jumping to the defense of the PAC, you might learn that the folks thought to be behind this are not new to politics.

]]> By: The Richmond Democrat http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-129487 The Richmond Democrat Sun, 04 May 2008 04:28:30 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-129487 Oh please, not sophistry, not from you Vivian. This was obviously a sample ballot produced by some unsophisticated people who are new to the game. "The PAC is so new that it hasn’t made any filings with the state . . ." These kinds of mistakes are made by inexperienced people new to activism. I could point to similar mistakes made by Clinton activists, but why bother? Don't get me wrong, these folks need to be corrected (maybe even punished), for their negligence, but don't go off the deep end, and don't pretend that Clinton's hands are entirely clean in regards to this issue. Just ask Lamont Williams. Oh please, not sophistry, not from you Vivian.

This was obviously a sample ballot produced by some unsophisticated people who are new to the game. “The PAC is so new that it hasn’t made any filings with the state . . .”

These kinds of mistakes are made by inexperienced people new to activism. I could point to similar mistakes made by Clinton activists, but why bother?

Don’t get me wrong, these folks need to be corrected (maybe even punished), for their negligence, but don’t go off the deep end, and don’t pretend that Clinton’s hands are entirely clean in regards to this issue. Just ask Lamont Williams.

]]> By: vjp http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-129467 vjp Sun, 04 May 2008 01:27:47 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-129467 I disagree. The ballot carries the title "Official" rather than Sample. If it's not a real ballot, it's got to be a fake. I disagree. The ballot carries the title “Official” rather than Sample. If it’s not a real ballot, it’s got to be a fake.

]]> By: The Richmond Democrat http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-129465 The Richmond Democrat Sun, 04 May 2008 01:22:25 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-129465 I think it's a stretch to call this a "fake" ballot: it's pretty clearly a botched attempt at a sample ballot. But I'm sure that accusing them of election fraud will win them over to Hillary's cause. I think it’s a stretch to call this a “fake” ballot: it’s pretty clearly a botched attempt at a sample ballot. But I’m sure that accusing them of election fraud will win them over to Hillary’s cause.

]]> By: Anon E. Mouse http://blog.vivianpaige.com/2008/05/03/fake-nc-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-129455 Anon E. Mouse Sun, 04 May 2008 00:09:10 +0000 http://vivianpaige.wordpress.com/?p=3252#comment-129455 Oh, the depths to which those Republicans will stoop -- sending out fake ballots to get Obama in trouble. :-) Oh, the depths to which those Republicans will stoop — sending out fake ballots to get Obama in trouble. :-)

]]>