Powell endorses Obama

In case you missed this morning’s Meet the Press, here is the video of Colin Powell endorsing Barack Obama for president.

13 Comments

  1. Howard
    Posted Monday, October 20, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Powell’s endorsement of Obama does not verify Obama’s judgement, but rather brings Powell’s judgement into question. Powell says that Obama is ready to lead … WHY? … Regardless of Powell’s last minute endorsement, Obama is still the most liberal senator in congress … who accomplished nothing in his meager 3 years in office, except voting present 160 times, and campaigning for President, as well as associating with anti-American racists and domestic terrorists … giving good speeches … and, taking America down the road to socialism. I used to respect Colin Powell … but, now that’s history!!!

  2. linda b
    Posted Monday, October 20, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Your points are just that…Repub talking points.
    Obama is not the most liberal senator.
    And socialism, hmm, let me see, Bush just “socialized” the banks.

  3. Anon E. Mouse
    Posted Monday, October 20, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    He was in 2007, according to the National Journal:

    Obama ranks as the magazine’s most liberal senator of 2007, his ranking was 16th in 2005 and 10th in 2006.

    And we’re not happy about Bush’s socialization of the banks, either. The fact that Bush is not as conservative as we had thought and hoped does not mean that Obama is not as socialist as we think and fear.

  4. rlewis
    Posted Monday, October 20, 2008 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    “Your points are just that…Repub talking points.”

    Just like Powell’s with regards to why he has endorsed Obama.

    His vote is about race, plain and simple!

  5. Anon E. Mouse
    Posted Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    I disagree, rlewis. I think his endorsement of Obama is about personal disappointment with the Republican Party and his place in it.

  6. Norris Hall
    Posted Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Is it about race?
    Only one person knows for sure…and it’s not Limbaugh.
    Powell claims that he’s not happy with the “rightward shift” of the Republican party. But is there any merit in his accusation???
    Listen to the views of Republican Senator Michelle Bachmann
    Video of Senator Michelle Bachmann on Hardball
    So…what do you think??. is Colin Powell was just being overly sensitive, or does he have a point???

  7. rlewis
    Posted Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    “I think his endorsement of Obama is about personal disappointment with the Republican Party and his place in it.”

    Mouse,
    I would agree with that. It doesn’t matter, this is already old news and the pundits have moved on to cover for Biden’s problem that Obama is not experienced enough to be president!

  8. Posted Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    I love the Republican’s “Obama is the most liberal EVAAAR” response to this. So what?

    lib·er·al
    –adjective
    -favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
    -favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.

    Since WHEN is that a bad thing?

  9. Anon E. Mouse
    Posted Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    “Obama is not experienced enough to be president!”

    That’s not news, either.

  10. Anon E. Mouse
    Posted Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    You’re right, Terry, the appropriate term to describe Obama is “leftist.”

    Jefferson was a liberal. Obama is not.

  11. Posted Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    I find it amusing that whenever you call a conservative on the true
    definition of liberal…they want to change the word to leftist. Let’s
    see leftist/socialist. That would make W. a leftist? Come on people
    which is it? So many labels…so little time. Grow up and accept the
    fact that a Black man will be our next president. He will be capable
    and “God Forbid” will lead this nation back to moral principals and an
    upstanding position in the world community. Eight years of lies and
    plundering our treasury is long enough! You wonder why General Powell
    abandoned his party and administration? Forgotten recent history? His
    own executive chief and vice chief lied to him and asked him to
    spread that lie to the United Nations. Pretty clear to me.

  12. Anon E. Mouse
    Posted Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    “That would make W. a leftist?”

    Certainly to the left of me — but B.O. is way left of W.

    If B.O. is such as “liberal,” why does he oppose the people’s right to keep and bear arms? Why have his thugs gone after Joe the Plumber?

    And Bush lied? Clinton lied under oath, and is the only President legitimately impeached! If Bush had Gen. Powell lie for him, then every intelligence service in the world was lying, too.

    Powell was never a Republican. Bush appointed Powell because he was considered to be the best person for the job — not because he was a Republican.

  13. Posted Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    WOW! Your state of denial is larger than I’d anticipated. I cannot
    even argue with your logic. I don’t know where to begin. Good thing
    my vote cancels yours. God Bless our voter system…