Local, Norfolk, Politics

BREAKING: Norfolk judge reverses Burfoot ruling

In a stunning turn of events, Judge Charles Poston has reversed his ruling from yesterday. The pdf is here.

Upon further consideration, the Court concludes that the temporary injunction should not have been granted.

The 1st Amendment prevailed. Excellent, Judge.

Now – can you get Mr. Burfoot to reimburse the city for the use of its attorney?

Note that the original complaint is now available here in pdf.

About Vivian J. Paige

A former candidate, I've learned a lot about politics, both good and bad. I'd prefer more of the former and a lot less of the latter and I'm trying to do my part!

Discussion

11 Responses to “BREAKING: Norfolk judge reverses Burfoot ruling”

  1. For once, I agree with Blacknell. I would add: “Wow!” I’ve practiced law for more than 20 years, and I’ve never had a judge in one of my cases reverse himself or herself sua sponte.

    Posted by James Young | Thursday, April 22, 2010, 6:38 pm
  2. So what happens now? Will Go Daddy.com reinstate the site…if it does, I can’t begin to imagine how many hits that site will get now!!

    Posted by Rediford New | Thursday, April 22, 2010, 7:35 pm
  3. That’s good news. I’m impressed that the judge was willing to admit fault.

    Posted by Waldo Jaquith | Thursday, April 22, 2010, 9:24 pm
  4. Hoping you can shine some light here Vivian: I read a comment posted in the VP article last night that said something about Burfoot’s campaign website was owned by a co-worker in the Treasurer’s office and the contact number listed in Whois is a number in that office. The comment addressed the legitimacy of developing a campaign website while on the clock in the Treasurer’s office. It seemed interesting so I looked it up on Whois and the post is true. Today, the comment has been deleted. Why would the Pilot do that? Does Mr. Burfoot have that much control?

    Posted by Inquisitive | Friday, April 23, 2010, 2:58 pm
    • I saw the comment but I don’t see it now. The Pilot has been deleting comments on this story – and I’m not sure why. If I were you, I’d complain to the management. There was no reason to delete that particular comment.

      Posted by vjp | Friday, April 23, 2010, 10:37 pm
  5. Long live the 1st amendment!

    I just love that pesky Constitution. It gives our politicians fits. :)

    Posted by Britt Howard | Friday, April 23, 2010, 10:37 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Norfolk vice mayor’s attempt to silence website unites political bloggers | Bearing Drift: Virginia Politics On Demand - Monday, April 26, 2010

Click to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. You get to pick how often and when!

We write about

SITES TO VISIT

ARCHIVES

LEGAL

Vivian J. Paige | All Politics is Local Copyright © 2006 - 2012. All rights reserved. No part of Vivian J. Paige | All Politics is Local may be used without the express written consent of the author. For more information, contact us.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,921 other followers