I was one of several bloggers invited to join Terry McAuliffe for dinner in NoVA Sunday. I wasn’t able to make the trip; however, because I knew he was going to be in Hampton Roads Saturday, I asked for a few minutes of his time. As it turns out, those “few minutes” turned into nearly two hours of conversation with the man who wants to be the next governor of Virginia.
Anyone who has ever met McAuliffe is always impressed with his energy. I first saw him in person a few months ago at a Hillary Clinton event. He is no different in a one-on-one session, reminiscent of the Energizer Bunny. He’s a man in a hurry, intent on making his points, leaning across the table that separated us to share off-the-record tidbits.
Terrence “Terry” McAuliffe, 51, was born and raised in Syracuse, NY, the youngest of four boys. His father was, according to some, a Democratic powerbroker and fundraiser who helped young Terry obtain a similar position with the campaign of Jimmy Carter. McAuliffe took the position after graduating from Catholic University (which he attended on an academic scholarship), traveling to 40 states to raise money for the president. Afterwards, he attended Georgetown Law School, graduating in 1984.
Since then, he has been at the forefront of Democratic fundraising, serving as the finance chair for numerous campaigns and organizations, including the DNC, DCCC, presidential candidate Dick Gephardt, and the Clinton-Gore reelection campaign. During his tenure (2001-2005) as chairman of the DNC, he is credited with raising $578 million, freeing the party from debt for the first time in its history.
Along the way, McAuliffe became a wealthy man himself. He is proud of starting his first business – a driveway maintenance company – at the age of 14, regaling me with the story of how he acquired a truck at age 15 in which to haul the driveway sealant. This entrepreneurial spirit carried over into politics. “‘I’ve met all of my business contacts through politics. It’s all interrelated,” he said in this 1999 interview. And like politics, some of his business deals have carried an aroma that is less than sweet smelling. Through it all, McAuliffe, referred to by some as “The Teflon Kingmaker,” has managed to stay above the fray.
Despite his lifelong involvement in politics, McAuliffe has never held public office. He told me, though, that he always wanted to run. He considers Virginia, where he has lived the last 20 years, to be home. He and his wife, Dorothy, have five children ranging in age from 9 to 17.
There were a couple of things that came out during the course of my interview. First, McAuliffe has done his homework about Virginia. He has big plans should he be elected governor, some of them – like getting rid of the Dillon Rule – near to my heart. His grasp of the issues – from energy to education, from health care to bonding – is admirable. His enthusiasm to make Virginia an even better place to live, work and raise a family is infectious. The businessman in him – he compared himself to Mark Warner – recognizes the challenges that lay ahead in these tough economic times and he has some ideas to ease them.
Of course, the governor of Virginia has to get things through the legislature, the workings of which both Brian Moran and Creigh Deeds have experience. McAuliffe believes that he can convince the legislature to go along with his plans, helped by the Democratic majority in the House and Senate, which he will help to achieve.
Which brings me to the second thing that emerged from our discussion as well as from my observance of him at the VBDC Holiday Party and Legislative Sendoff: McAuliffe seems to believe that everything can be solved by money. His mention of money in nearly every context is off-putting. He has said that if he is the party nominee, he will raise money for the downticket races, and help Democrats gain the majority in the House. I guess he expects the Democrats in the legislature to reward this largesse by approving his plans for public-private partnerships, for incentives to lure companies to Virginia, for changing the bonding process. Early in our conversation he mentioned that he had more money than he could ever spend, and certainly demonstrated this when he announced a $5,000 contribution to John LaCombe, the candidate in the 81st.
Don’t get me wrong – money isn’t a bad thing. But it just came across as ostentatious and quite un-Virginian, not to mention that it sounds like he’s trying to buy his way into the governor’s mansion. Of course, he is not necessarily talking about spending his own money (this article indicates that he plans to raise $10 million by the end of the month), as this article mentions. (To his credit, when asked about this, McAuliffe offered a reasonable explanation for his lack of contributions during the time he was DNC chair: that if he did them, he would have been beseiged by candidates all over the country. Of course, that doesn’t explain 2007.)
Terry McAuliffe brings a different perspective to Virginia politics, one not weighted down by the quid pro quo relationships we have become accustomed to. (I actually threw out a name or two and he wasn’t familiar with them. That’s a good thing.) And, to be sure, we can count on never a dull moment if he is the nominee. Although I have already made my choice, I look forward to seeing this campaign unfold.
~
By the way, anyone who thinks McAuliffe is not in this race is delusional. First, Virginia doesn’t have “exploratory committees.” And second, it is just not in McAuliffe’s nature to do things halfway. He’s in – and he’s in to win.
~
UPDATE: The Huffington Post has updated their story (linked above) referencing the $10 millon. Apparently, the source was not with the McAuliffe campaign team.
Great post Vivian. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to meet and hear Terry speak at the VBDC party. I’m pretty enthused by the coverage of his touring of Virginia, and how people are responding. He seems to be doing well in minimizing the negativity that many were eyeing him with.
– Joel
Virginia Beach Progressives
You mention his plans for public-private partnerships. Is there more information about that somewhere? Like what does he want to use them for and does he point to some examples that he wants to emulate?
We have public-private partnerships currently. The most notable ones I can think of stem from the Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA). I just wonder whether this is the model he likes.
Thanks for the insight Vivian … always good to get your take on things … good to learn he’s getting to know who’s important to spend time with … Happy Holidays to you and yours!
Why is it that it seems that a lot of the local bloggers are against this guy in the 81st? I saw him at the taxpayer forum and though he was actually pretty good.
Joel – no need to put your blog into your comment. It is there by default in your user name if you fill in the box.
tx2vadem – he mentioned it in our conversation. I haven’t looked for it on his site but it might be there.
vadem – thanks!
Jamie – not sure what your comment has to do with this post. But I haven’t seen anyone being “against” LaCombe.
Thanks for a very well written, well thought out and balanced post on McAuliffe. I met him once briefly and had the same impressions as you. He’s energetic and personable. In a brief meeting it’s hard not to like him.
But I too am put off by his emphasis on money. It makes him seem like an interloper trying to buy the primary and then election, something that doesn’t work well in Virginia. It may be unintentional and he may not be aware he’s creating that perception, but it’s how it’s coming off to some of us.
I also worry about the public-private partnerships. Some of them are very good and I support the concept. But sometimes that’s just a euphenism for privatizing a government service. Given what we are learning about how the Bush administration (and even the Clinton administration to a lesser extent) misused government contracting and the abuses, cost overruns and lack of oversight that caused, I think we need to be very careful and question Mr. McAuliffe and all the candidates to get specifics on what they mean by public-private partnerships and the type of oversight they plan for them.
I am happy, though, that somebody is taking on the Dillon Rule directly. It should have been repealed long ago. I hope it becomes an issue in this election.
Again, thanks for the thought provoking post. And Merry Christmas.
Chesapeake is going to benefit from a private partnership that would otherwise keep the Jordan Bridge closed forever. At least Terry has the business fore sight to make sure this kind of agreement can work. As far as money, well you might not like it but, lets face it, it was not a dirty word for the Obama or Clinton campaigns.
by stander,
If a private entity can figure out how to keep it open and make a profit from doing so (if there was no profit, they wouldn’t do it) why can’t the commonwealth do it as well?
LD – go over to Bacon’s Rebellion and read their post on this. It explains how the proposal by Schuet and his group differs from the government one.
Vivian,
Thanks for the link. It is a strong argument for privatization.
But personally I am against any measure that would give more benefits to the wealthy at the expense of the middle class and the poor.
If you have enough money in your pocket, you can pay the toll and travel there. If you can’t afford the toll, please get out of the way of those who are wealthy.