From the Richmond Times Dispatch:
Three Richmond-area House Democrats — including a Baptist minister — who supported a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage now say they’ll vote against it because it’s too broad.
[…]
House Minority Leader Franklin P. Hall; Del. Dwight Clinton Jones, senior pastor of First Baptist Church of South Richmond; and Del. A. Donald McEachin of Henrico say the three-sentence proposal that will face state voters Nov. 7 goes far beyond simply defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
[…]
Three other local lawmakers, who voted against the measure in the legislature, reiterated their opposition and urged Virginians to vote no — state Sens. Benjamin J. Lambert III and Henry L. Marsh III and Del. Jennifer L. McClellan, all of Richmond.
[…]
“It’s unneeded,” said Jones, chairman of the Legislative Black Caucus. “Voting against the amendment does not suggest that an individual does not believe that a marriage is between a man and a woman.”
After further interpretation of the measure, Jones said he recognized “the unintended consequences of this amendment.”
[…]
“Like the blind man cured by Jesus, even after much prayer, the first time I looked at this amendment, I didn’t see its breadth or its basic meanness,” he [McEachin] said. “Only after I was touched a second time was I able to see this amendment in its true light.”
Seeing the light, indeed. Volunteer and contribute today. And Vote NO on November 7.
Technorati Tags: Marshall Newman Amendment, Virginia Marriage Amendment
Good for them! I am so happy to hear this. Thanks Vivian.
Great news, Vivian. Perphas they can talk with Creigh Deeds.
These people voted for the amendment to be on the ballot and now don’t like it? Then why did they vote for it?! Sheeze. That just makes them look like they don’t know what the heck they’re doing in Richmond!
I wonder how many other things they’ve voted for in Richmond that they didn’t understand? It doesn’t give me a lot of faith in our lawmakers. Unless this is all really about something else…….surely it wouldn’t be politics…….would it? 🙂