Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State

National, Politics 1 Minute

Hillary ClintonUnless you’ve been under a rock, you know that President-elect Barack Obama has designated former rival Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State. I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I think she will make a great S of S. On the other hand, I think this marks the pinnacle of her political career and in a few years, the end. In so many ways, I wish she had remained the Senator from New York, as I feel her abililty to accomplish her stated goals for America would have been easier there.

Published

17 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State”

  3. But think about it this way.

    Given how far down in the ranks of seniority she is, and the fact that most of the people in front of her are unlikely to leave the Senate in any manner other than feet first, it’s pretty unlikely that she’d be moving up the leadership ladder anytime soon.

    She wouldn’t be able to run in 2012, and she’ll likely be considered too old in 2016.

    It’s an Arnie Vinick all over again.

  4. I’m not thinking about advancing her political career. I’m thinking about her advocacy for the domestic issues that she put forth during her campaign.

    (And 2008 was her only shot at the presidency – she’s 60 already.)

  5. Perhaps you will still get your wish. Someone of political influence and respect for the U.S. Constitution may yet discover that Senator Clinton is prohibited from being confirmed. See Article 1 Section 6 U.S. Constitution (emoluments clause). More on my post here:
    http://the.virginianfederalist.com/2008/11/hillary-ineligible-for-secretary-of.html.

    One may also think that the appointment of Susan Rice as U.N. ambassador and elevation to cabinet rank may be intended to keep Mrs. Clinton in a gilded but stout cage.

  6. Actually, I understand that the way around that problem is to reduce the salary. So I think that one will be moot.

    And the Rice appointment is another reason I’d just as soon Hillary had stayed in the Senate.

  7. I’m not thinking about advancing her political career. I’m thinking about her advocacy for the domestic issues that she put forth during her campaign.

    There was an article last week that made the point that any effort on her part to take the lead on issues like health care would have been fruitless given that more senior Senators — Ted Kennedy being one — have already taken the lead on that topic.

  8. Actually, I understand that the way around that problem is to reduce the salary. So I think that one will be moot.

    It’s called the Saxby fix, and Richard Nixon used it back in the 1970s.

    But, there’s a pretty credible argument from one law professor that the Saxby fix doesn’t get around the problem:

    http://tinyurl.com/6ntxan

    Strictly read, the Emoluments Clause would seem to bar Clinton from serving, but I doubt it will ever come to that.

  9. Vivian, I consider what Hillary Clinton did, in accepting the post of Sec. of State, in the best patriotic interest of our nation and the world … she has proven once again that she is an awesome force never to be underestimated … I feel relatively certain her voice in the cabinet will advance her many causes more than if she had remained a Senator from NY … and we will all be better for her contributions

  10. Doug – articles notwithstanding, I think Hillary would have been a force to reckon with in the Senate. She’s earned it.

    And Shawn, I don’t think her serving in the cabinet will advance her causes, especially not the domestic ones. Everyone has to stay in their own lanes.

  11. Vivian,

    Nonetheless, she accepted the job.

    Which may be an indication that she thinks she can contribute more as Secretary of State and that the domestic issues she campaigned on aren’t as important to her as she led supporters to believe.

Comments are closed.