Two op-eds, reprinted in The Virginian-Pilot, crossed into the territory of the ridiculous.
- NY Times columnist Ross Douthat put the blame for the deterioration of traditional marriage on the increase in support for marriage equality. If you didn’t get that impression by reading the piece, then Douthat himself made it abundantly clear in this followup one (which was not in our paper).
- And Cal Thomas has declared that black = liberal, namely in the form of Dr. Ben Carson. I’m sure Virginia Black Conservatives love to know that they are being so categorized.
Is there something in the water these days?
I’m not one of the crowd currently swooning over Ben Carson, nor am I particularly fond of Cal Thomas, but it doesn’t seem that anything that Thomas wrote in that piece suggests that he “has declared that black = liberal.” Thomas pointed out how some of Carson’s detractors took issue with some of his political statements (or perhaps you can tell me what they might have meant by calling him an Uncle Tom?), but Thomas’ pointing out their statements is hardly the same as his making those associations, is it?
The opening of Cal Thomas’ piece:
It doesn’t get any clearer than that.
The rest of the column makes clear Thomas does NOT count Carson as one of those “successful liberals,” doesn’t it? If Carson is a liberal according to Thomas, then how are the “detractors” to be classified?
At the least, Mr. Thomas’ piece was very poorly worded. I know many Black conservatives, and they are some of the staunchest I know, too.
The institution of marriage has been taking a beating for some time now — “no fault” divorce, rampant divorce, multiple marriages, etc. Does any pastor still preach on Jesus’ words, “If you divorce your wife, you force her to commit adultery. If you marry a divorced woman, you commit adultery with her.”
And does any pastor still preach on how husbands and wives are to behave toward each other, as in Ephesians 5?
Very few do, I suspect.
But if the pastors merely preach what we want to hear, what good are they?
If they do not preach the sanctity of heterosexual marriage, how can we object when they support homosexual marriage?