Payday lending regulation back on the table

Del. Glen Oder (R-NN) has introduced a bill calling for a 36% cap on interest rates for payday lenders. I’m not going to rehash all I’ve written about payday lending; suffice it to say that putting these lenders under the same regulation as other lenders is a step in the right direction.

Contact your legislators, ask them to sign on as a patron of this bill and ask them to support it.

37 thoughts on “Payday lending regulation back on the table

  1. Vivian,

    You have certainly divined my beliefs aon usury laws. I suppose that my direct question for you would reflect what Dr. Tabor mentioned above. Why not let adults have the freedom to take out whichever sorts of loans they wish? Are the potential bad outcomes such that the paternalistic state should preempt them?

  2. That has got to be one of your stupidest posts to date, BM, and that’s saying something.

    What relevance does selling one’s children into slavery have to payday lending and usury?

  3. Brian – it really isn’t a matter of diving, it’s trying to get to the nitty gritty. If you and Donald really believe in letting the market decide, then the only answer is to do away with the usury laws. That way, all lenders are on equal footing and have the same ability to offer the same loans.

    If you support payday lending, then you must also support the end of usury laws. Otherwise, you are supporting government allowing one type of lender to get preferential treatment, no?

    Mouse – as usual, you’re playing a semantics game.

  4. As Jefferson put it: “No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.”

    The government has no role in the terms of contracts between adults so long as they do not commit aggression against the rights of others.

    So, of course I am opposed to usury laws, along with any other law that interferes in my choices when I am not doing harm to anyone else. If had had my way, we would repeal so many of our existing laws that law school would be a Community College Associate Degree. πŸ™‚

  5. So you’re saying that it would be perfectly acceptable to sell yourself into slavery, then? Presumably you’re going to say no, but then you’ve restrained the right to contract. It’s a bit of silliness that doesn’t really hold up, I think. But I know better than to get into arguments with a libertarian. I’m liable to get shot with one of those guns they’re always going on about πŸ™‚

    (Neverminding, of course, how the entire house of cards falls down when you start taking into account having to actually bear the costs of all your actions.)

    ~

    And if I had my way, dentists wouldn’t seem like ambassadors from medieval torture chambers. πŸ™‚

  6. Brian – I think I’ve answered the question over and over, which is why I linked in the post to all of my posts on the subject. I’m not convinced that allowing people to make bad decisions, particularly at a time when they are vulnerable, is the answer.

    There is a presumption, not only in this case but in many others, that everyone has the information to make an informed decision. I know from experience that is a dangerous presumption.

  7. “Mouse – as usual, you’re playing a semantics game.”

    Yes, I am using words for their proper meaning.

    So what do you propose, Vivian? There is a market for these loans because people have to pay rent, electricity, water, etc. They have already made the bad financial decisions that got them to the point of eviction or service cutoff. Now what? Do they go to a legal payday lender, do they go to a loan shark, or do they get evicted?

  8. Good grief! Talk about beating a dead horse. Y’all don’t want a conversation – you want an argument.

    No amount of browbeating is going to change my position on this. Payday lending as approved by the legislature of Virginia was wrong from the start.

    Look – if you don’t want the payday lending to go away, contact your legislators. If you want it to go away, contact your legislators.

  9. I DO want a conversation, Vivian, which is why I asked the questions I asked.

    You want payday lending to be illegal (so only criminals will offer them), but will not consider the potential consequences of making such loans illegal. Those consequences are that people will go to loan-sharks or face foreclosure and termination of services.

  10. MB,

    Please. Your slavery query was beyond silly.

    As for my “Lord of the Flies approach to society,” why are you so afraid of freedom?

Comments are closed.